Opens in a new tab

Stopping Statins After 70: What the STREAM Trial Shows

Table of Content

Stopping statins after 70: a doctor shows a pill organiser and a blood test tube to an older patient

⚕️ This article is for informational purposes only and does not replace medical advice. Always consult your doctor to interpret your results.

Should you keep taking your statin after 70 if you have never had a heart attack or stroke? On 7 November 2026, at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, the STREAM trial offered the strongest answer so far. Published the same day in The New England Journal of Medicine, the study found that stopping the statin was not inferior to continuing it on the main two-year measure, but that heart attacks, strokes and deaths were somewhat more common after stopping.

If you or a parent have taken a statin for years, here is what that means, what it does not mean, and which blood tests are worth following with your doctor.

What the STREAM trial tested

STREAM was a randomised trial run in Switzerland, the Netherlands and France. It enrolled more than 1,880 adults aged 70 and older who had at least two chronic conditions, no known cardiovascular disease, and at least a year on a statin for primary prevention (meaning to prevent a first event). A random draw decided whether they stopped or continued the drug. The trial was open-label, with no placebo, but experts who did not know each person's group judged the cardiovascular events. The main outcome combined non-fatal heart attack, non-fatal ischemic stroke and death, with a non-inferiority margin set in advance at 5.2 weeks of event-free survival over two years.

The results: "non-inferior," but not risk-free

According to HCPLive's report of the NEJM data, participants averaged 77.5 years old and stopping the statin stayed within the planned margin: the difference in event-free survival was about 2 weeks over two years. Looking at events, the main outcome occurred in 12.7% of people who stopped versus 9.2% of those who continued (hazard ratio 1.38). The authors estimate roughly one extra event for every 40 people who stopped for two years. No clear differences appeared in quality of life, pain, falls or sarcopenia (age-related muscle loss).

In a small subgroup of 235 people, LDL cholesterol at one year averaged about 176 mg/dL (4.55 mmol/L) after stopping versus about 99 mg/dL (2.56 mmol/L) for those who continued. HCPLive also reports that the trial's safety board advised people in the stopping group to discuss restarting with their doctor, and the authors, including Dr. Nicolas Rodondi of Bern, stress shared decision-making.

How STREAM fits with other trials

STREAM does not contradict the French SAGA/SITE trial or the Australian STAREE trial, which we covered in Statins After 70: What the STAREE Trial Found. Together they say the right choice depends on the person. STREAM's participants are the patients doctors see most often: people over 70 with several conditions. An earlier observational analysis from the Bern group had already pointed the same way, with more events, mostly non-cardiovascular deaths, in older patients who stopped a statin.

What this changes for you

  • Never stop a statin on your own. STREAM is not a green light to quit; it is a tool for a conversation.
  • Stopping can reasonably be discussed if you have troublesome side effects, limited life expectancy, many medicines, or different priorities.
  • If you continue, a blood test confirms the treatment is working, and it stays useful even at 80.

Which tests can monitor or screen for this?

Latest scientific advances

Researchers in Bern had already reported, in an observational analysis published in 2025, that older patients taking many medicines had more events, mainly non-cardiovascular deaths, after stopping a statin. STREAM now adds evidence from true randomisation. What remains is identifying who can stop safely, which the trial cannot yet do. In practice that means fewer decisions made by age alone and more made case by case.

When to see a doctor

Talk to your doctor if you are over 70 and wonder whether your statin is still worthwhile, or if you notice muscle pain, unusual fatigue or dark urine on treatment. Do not stop any medicine without medical advice. Call 999 or 112 right away for chest pain, sudden shortness of breath or signs of stroke (facial droop, arm weakness, trouble speaking).

Glossary

  • Statin: a medicine that lowers LDL cholesterol by blocking its production in the liver.
  • Primary prevention: treatment meant to prevent a first heart attack or stroke in someone who has never had one.
  • Non-inferiority trial: a trial designed to show that one option (here, stopping) is not worse than the other beyond a margin set in advance.
  • Multimorbidity: having two or more chronic conditions.
  • Sarcopenia: gradual loss of muscle mass and strength with age.

FAQ

Can you stop statins after 70?

It is an individual decision to make with your doctor. STREAM found stopping was not inferior on its prespecified main outcome, but with somewhat more cardiovascular events and deaths in the stopping group.

What happens to cholesterol when you stop a statin?

It usually climbs back toward its pre-treatment level. In the STREAM subgroup that was measured, LDL averaged about 176 mg/dL (4.55 mmol/L) after a year off the drug.

Does STREAM apply to people who have had a heart attack?

No. It covered primary prevention only. After a heart attack or stroke, statins are generally continued.

Are side effects a reason to stop?

They can be, but a different statin, dose or schedule may be tried first. Talk to your doctor before changing anything.

Should I get my cholesterol checked after 70?

Yes, if you are on treatment or have risk factors. Your doctor sets the schedule.

Sources

Other articles

Understand your own blood test results with AI DiagMe

Following your cholesterol on a statin? Upload your blood test to AI DiagMe and get a clear, personalised explanation of every value in minutes, so you can prepare your questions for your doctor.

Editorial team

  • AI DiagMe

    Author

    The AI DiagMe team brings together physicians, clinical specialists, and medical editors. Our articles are written by health communication professionals and then reviewed and validated by the physicians of our scientific committee, composed of practising hospital physicians in specialties such as haematology, endocrinology, and general medicine. Julien Priour, who leads the editorial mission, holds an MBA from HEC Paris and was trained in scientific writing and publishing by the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD, FUN-MOOC, 2026). Each piece of content is based on current clinical guidelines and peer-reviewed medical publications.

    Email Website
  • Julien Priour

    Edited by

    Co-founder and CEO of AI DiagMe · Senior medical editor · HEC Paris graduate

    Julien Priour is a senior medical editor at AI DiagMe, where he oversees the editorial line and the fact-checking process. A graduate of HEC Paris, he has 3 years of experience in health publishing and was trained in scientific writing and publishing by the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD, FUN-MOOC, 2026). He makes sure that every article follows current medical guidelines and is reviewed and validated by a physician from the scientific and ethics committee. He sets the sourcing standards (HAS, Ameli, INSERM…) and the review standards applied across the entire site.

    Email LinkedIn
  • Dr. Claude Tchonko

    Medically reviewed by

    Dr Claude Tchonko is a haematologist, in practice since 2013, currently working at Clinique Mas de Rochet (Castelnau-le-Lez, France). With an international background, he specialises in the management of haematological malignancies (leukemias, lymphomas, myelomas), with particular expertise in autologous stem cell transplantation, CAR-T cell therapy and the optimisation of care pathways in onco-haematology.

    Author of a reference work, ‘Lymphoid Haematological Malignancies in Mali’, he combines clinical practice with active involvement in projects developing technology solutions for healthcare.

    He holds a State Doctorate in Medicine (Faculty of Medicine of Bamako, 2006) and completed his training with a Certificate of Specialized Studies in Bioclinical Haematology (Abidjan-Cocody, 2010) and several university diplomas: a DFMS in Haematology and an inter-university diploma (DIU) in Onco-Haematological Cytogenetics (Grenoble), as well as a university diploma (DU) in major sickle cell disease (UPEC).

    Dr. Claude Tchonko LinkedIn

Related Posts

Coming soon