Opens in a new tab

Prostate Cancer Blood Test: Proteins Found 15 Years Before Diagnosis

Table of Content

Prostate cancer blood test illustration with blood proteins in a vessel, a clock and a man discussing results with his GP

⚕️ This article is for informational purposes only and does not replace medical advice. Always consult your doctor to interpret your results.

Could a prostate cancer blood test one day flag risk long before a tumour shows up? A study from the University of Oxford, published in October 2026 in European Urology, found that certain proteins circulating in the blood were linked to prostate cancer diagnosed more than 10 years later, and in some cases more than 15 years later. The work is not a new test you can request today, but it adds early clues to the familiar PSA story.

Here is what the researchers measured, what they found, what it changes for you now, and which tests are actually used to check the prostate.

What the Oxford prostate cancer study found

The team, led by Zhe Huang, Karl Smith-Byrne and Ruth Travis of Oxford Population Health, used blood samples stored in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), a large cohort that collected samples between 1992 and 2000. They compared 982 men who later developed prostate cancer with a random group of 1,573 men from the same cohort. Of the cancers, 290 were classed as aggressive.

Using a high-throughput platform called SomaScan, they measured more than 6,000 proteins in each plasma sample, then looked at which ones were linked to a later diagnosis.

  • Three proteins were linked to overall prostate cancer risk: KLK3, ACP3 and FLT4. KLK3 is the protein measured by the standard PSA test.
  • Seven proteins were linked to aggressive disease. One of them, ANKRD1, stood out across several clinically important forms of the disease.
  • Twelve proteins were linked to cancers diagnosed more than 15 years after the blood sample was taken, including ANXA2, GZMK and OSCAR.
  • Proteins made by known cancer driver genes, including ERBB3, KRAS and NRAS, were associated with future aggressive cancer.

Key figures at a glance

ProteinLinked toHazard ratio per 1 SD increase
KLK3 (PSA)Overall prostate cancer2.28
FLT4Overall prostate cancer1.26
ACP3Overall prostate cancer1.20

A hazard ratio of 1.20 means roughly a 20% higher risk over time for each step up in the protein level, compared with men lower on the scale. It describes groups of men, not an individual prediction.

Proteins that may lower the risk

Not every signal pointed towards more risk. Higher levels of two immune-related proteins, GZMK and ANXA2, were associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer diagnosed more than 15 years later. GZMK is made by immune cells that can kill damaged cells. The researchers see this as a hint that the immune system may play a role in the earliest stages of the disease, long before any symptom or change in PSA.

Why this is not a new screening test yet

The authors describe their results as exploratory. The study is observational: it shows links between protein levels and later cancer, not that these proteins cause the disease. When the team checked their findings in a second US cohort, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, only some of them held up: ACP3, ANXA2, APOC2 and KLK3 showed consistent results. Genetic analyses supported a causal role for only a few proteins.

Most importantly for patients, the study did not show that adding these proteins predicts prostate cancer better than PSA and the usual clinical factors. As both Euronews and News-Medical report, more validation is needed before any of this reaches the GP surgery.

What it means for prostate cancer screening today

For now, nothing changes in practice. In the United States, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that men aged 55 to 69 make an individual decision about PSA screening with their clinician, after weighing up the benefits and harms, and recommends against routine PSA screening from the age of 70. The Task Force notes that this recommendation is being updated.

The PSA test has known limitations. A raised PSA does not always mean cancer: an infection, an enlarged prostate or recent ejaculation can raise it. A normal result does not fully rule cancer out. The long-term aim of research such as the Oxford study is to distinguish men who are likely to develop an aggressive cancer from those whose cancer would never cause harm. Read our guide to the PSA blood test to find out how to interpret your own result.

Which tests are used to check the prostate?

  • PSA blood test: the main blood marker, interpreted alongside age, prostate size, medicines and previous results.
  • Free PSA and PSA trends: the proportion of free PSA and how quickly PSA rises can help decide whether to investigate further.
  • Digital rectal examination: a quick physical check of the prostate by your GP.
  • Prostate MRI: often used after an abnormal PSA to decide whether a biopsy is needed.
  • Biopsy: the only way to confirm a diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Lifestyle research continues too. A recent study looked at ultra-processed foods and prostate cancer, and large protein panels are also being tested to estimate overall mortality risk.

Latest scientific advances

Based on articles retrieved from PubMed, the Oxford study is part of a fast-growing field that searches the blood for signs of cancer years in advance.

The main study itself, published in European Urology, describes candidate proteins linked to immune defence, cell adhesion, blood vessel growth and known prostate cancer genes. The authors present them as leads for future research and prevention, not as a ready-made test (DOI).

A 2026 review by the same Oxford group, in eBioMedicine, pooled long-term studies of blood proteins and cancer. Many protein signals held up for lung and bowel cancer, but very few did for prostate cancer, which shows how hard it is to find reliable early markers for this disease (DOI).

A 2025 study from China, using UK Biobank data, found two other proteins, TSPAN1 and GP2, that began to rise several years before a prostate cancer diagnosis. Different studies are pointing to different proteins, so independent confirmation is the key next step (DOI 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002805).

What this means for you: PSA remains the blood test that matters for prostate cancer today. Protein panels may one day help to target screening, but they are still at the research stage.

When to talk to your doctor

Talk to your GP about PSA testing if you are between 55 and 69, or earlier if your father or brother has had prostate cancer, if you are Black, or if you carry a BRCA2 or other inherited gene change linked to cancer. See a doctor promptly if you notice blood in your urine or semen, a weak or interrupted urine flow, needing to pass urine frequently at night, or new pain in the back, hips or pelvis.

Glossary

  • PSA (prostate-specific antigen): a protein made by the prostate, measured in a blood test; its gene is called KLK3.
  • Proteomics: the large-scale measurement of thousands of proteins in a sample.
  • Cohort study: a study that follows a group of people over time to see who develops a disease.
  • Hazard ratio: a measure comparing how quickly an event happens in one group compared with another.
  • Aggressive prostate cancer: cancer that is high grade, advanced, or likely to spread or be fatal.
  • Driver gene: a gene whose changes help to push a normal cell towards cancer.

FAQ

Is there a blood test that predicts prostate cancer 15 years in advance?

Not yet. The Oxford study found proteins linked to cancers diagnosed more than 15 years later, but the results are exploratory and have not been turned into a test.

Does this study replace the PSA test?

No. PSA itself was one of the strongest signals in the study, and the authors did not show that the new proteins improve prediction beyond PSA.

Can I ask my laboratory for these protein tests?

No. The SomaScan platform used in the study is a research tool and is not part of routine blood tests.

Why do some proteins seem protective?

Higher GZMK and ANXA2 levels were linked to a lower long-term risk. Both are linked to immune activity, which may help to keep early abnormal cells in check, but this still needs to be proven.

At what age should men consider PSA screening?

The USPSTF advises men aged 55 to 69 to decide with their clinician. Men at higher risk may start the conversation earlier.

Sources

Other articles

Understand your own blood test results with AI DiagMe

Has your PSA come back high, or has it risen since your last test? Upload your blood test results to AI DiagMe for a clear, personalised explanation in plain English, to help you prepare for your next conversation with your doctor.

Editorial team

  • AI DiagMe

    Author

    The AI DiagMe team brings together physicians, clinical specialists, and medical editors. Our articles are written by health communication professionals and then reviewed and validated by the physicians of our scientific committee, composed of practising hospital physicians in specialties such as haematology, endocrinology, and general medicine. Julien Priour, who leads the editorial mission, holds an MBA from HEC Paris and was trained in scientific writing and publishing by the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD, FUN-MOOC, 2026). Each piece of content is based on current clinical guidelines and peer-reviewed medical publications.

    Email Website
  • Julien Priour

    Edited by

    Co-founder and CEO of AI DiagMe · Senior medical editor · HEC Paris graduate

    Julien Priour is a senior medical editor at AI DiagMe, where he oversees the editorial line and the fact-checking process. A graduate of HEC Paris, he has 3 years of experience in health publishing and was trained in scientific writing and publishing by the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD, FUN-MOOC, 2026). He makes sure that every article follows current medical guidelines and is reviewed and validated by a physician from the scientific and ethics committee. He sets the sourcing standards (HAS, Ameli, INSERM…) and the review standards applied across the entire site.

    Email LinkedIn
  • Dr. Claude Tchonko

    Medically reviewed by

    Dr Claude Tchonko is a haematologist, in practice since 2013, currently working at Clinique Mas de Rochet (Castelnau-le-Lez, France). With an international background, he specialises in the management of haematological malignancies (leukemias, lymphomas, myelomas), with particular expertise in autologous stem cell transplantation, CAR-T cell therapy and the optimisation of care pathways in onco-haematology.

    Author of a reference work, ‘Lymphoid Haematological Malignancies in Mali’, he combines clinical practice with active involvement in projects developing technology solutions for healthcare.

    He holds a State Doctorate in Medicine (Faculty of Medicine of Bamako, 2006) and completed his training with a Certificate of Specialized Studies in Bioclinical Haematology (Abidjan-Cocody, 2010) and several university diplomas: a DFMS in Haematology and an inter-university diploma (DIU) in Onco-Haematological Cytogenetics (Grenoble), as well as a university diploma (DU) in major sickle cell disease (UPEC).

    Dr. Claude Tchonko LinkedIn

Related Posts

Coming soon