Opens in a new tab

Bacterial or Viral Infection? FDA Clears a 15-Minute Blood Test

Table of Content

Blood tube in front of a lab analyser between bacteria and viruses, showing a test for bacterial or viral infection

⚕️ This article is for informational purposes only and does not replace medical advice. Always consult your doctor to interpret your results.

Fever, cough, sore throat: is it a bacterial or viral infection? The answer often decides whether you leave with an antibiotic, and it is surprisingly hard to call in A&E or at an urgent treatment centre. On 3 November 2026, the FDA cleared a new version of the MeMed BV test, a blood test that reads your immune response and returns a result in about 15 minutes. Here is what the test measures, what the studies show, its limits, and what your own blood tests (CRP, procalcitonin, white blood cell count) can already tell you.

What the FDA cleared

MeMed BV, developed by the Israeli company MeMed, was first cleared in the US in 2023 on its own small analyser. The news is its wider reach: the new Access MeMed BV runs on Beckman Coulter's DxI 9000 and Access 2 immunoassay analysers, which are already installed in many hospital and urgent care laboratories. According to the manufacturer and Healio, the clearance covers:

  • adults and children as young as 90 days;
  • suspected acute infection, typically seen in A&E, urgent care or at hospital admission;
  • a serum or plasma sample, with a result in as little as 15 minutes on the DxI 9000.

The result is always interpreted together with the physical examination and other tests. It is not a routine test you can order from a high-street or private lab.

How it works: reading the immune response

Most infection tests look for the germ itself: a rapid strep test, a flu, COVID-19 or RSV PCR, a urine culture. MeMed BV does the opposite. It measures three proteins your own body makes, whose levels shift depending on whether it is fighting bacteria or a virus:

  • TRAIL, a protein that rises mainly during viral infections;
  • IP-10, another signal of the antiviral defence;
  • CRP (C-reactive protein), the familiar inflammation marker, which tends to climb higher in bacterial infections.

An algorithm combines the three values into a score from 0 to 100. A low score points to a viral (or other non-bacterial) cause, a high score to a bacterial infection, and a middle zone is reported as equivocal. On its own, CRP can be high in both situations, which is why it does not always settle the question. Pairing it with two virus-sensitive proteins sharpens the distinction.

Why it matters: antibiotics and resistance

When doctors are unsure, many antibiotics are prescribed “just in case”. Yet antibiotics do nothing against the viruses behind colds, flu, bronchiolitis and most sore throats and bronchitis, and every unnecessary course helps resistant bacteria spread. According to the CDC, at least 28% of antibiotics prescribed in US outpatient settings are unnecessary, and most human antibiotic use happens outside the hospital.

A test that helps the clinician say “this is very likely viral” can make it easier to skip an antibiotic you do not need. A clearly bacterial result, on the other hand, supports treating quickly and looking further. Healio notes that the clearance came about a week after new CDC data on infections and deaths caused by antimicrobial-resistant germs.

What the test does not do

  • It does not name the germ. A “bacterial” result does not tell which bacterium is involved or which antibiotic will work; urine cultures, blood cultures, or throat swabs are still needed.
  • It is not a routine checkup test: the clearance targets emergency, urgent care and hospital admission settings.
  • Some results are equivocal, and some people have a viral and a bacterial infection at the same time.
  • Used outside its intended setting (for example, to decide on blood cultures in A&E), it loses much of its accuracy, according to a 2026 study in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
  • Much of the research was funded or co-authored by the manufacturer, so more independent studies are needed.

Recent advances

Host-response tests have been studied extensively over the past three years. The overall picture is encouraging, with important nuances.

  • In the emergency department, a large US and Israeli study (Apollo, 2024) found the test closely matched the judgment of experts who reviewed each patient's full record. A “viral” result was especially reliable for ruling out a bacterial infection.
  • A 2026 systematic review pooling sixteen studies confirmed these findings in adults and children, and observed that clinicians using the test reserved antibiotics more often for the patients who needed them.
  • A pilot randomized trial in adults with lower respiratory infections (JUNO, 2025) suggested more targeted prescribing without more return visits or hospital admissions.
  • In people over 65, who are often harder to diagnose, the test performed as well as in younger adults (pooled analysis, 2025).
  • An economic model for France and Spain (2026) suggested that adding the test to the care of suspected pneumonia in A&E could avoid unnecessary antibiotics and tests and lower costs. It is a simulation, not a study of real patients.
  • However, in adults hospitalized with a respiratory infection (2024), the test caught almost every bacterial infection but wrongly labeled many viral infections as bacterial: its value depends on who is being tested.

What it means for you: this type of test may increasingly complement CRP and procalcitonin in A&E, helping your care team decide faster whether an antibiotic makes sense.

Which tests can monitor or screen for a bacterial or viral infection?

Several tests help your clinician lean one way or the other. None is enough on its own.

TestWhat it showsMain limitation
CRP (C-reactive protein)General inflammation; a very high level points toward bacteriaAlso rises in some viral infections, after injury, or with inflammatory diseases
Procalcitonin (PCT)Rises mainly in bacterial infections; used in hospitalsLess useful in mild or localized infections
Full blood count (FBC) with differentialExcess neutrophils: more often bacterial; excess lymphocytes: more often viralThe patterns overlap a lot
MeMed BV (TRAIL, IP-10, CRP)Probability score for bacterial versus viral infectionMainly in A&E, urgent care and hospitals; some results are equivocal
Urine culture, blood cultures, swabsIdentify the bacterium and the antibiotic that works (sensitivity testing)Results take one to several days
Rapid strep test, PCR testsDetect a specific germ (strep, flu, COVID-19, RSV)Only find the germs they look for

If your results include CRP, procalcitonin or a full blood count (FBC), read them alongside your symptoms and how long they have lasted: a single value rarely gives the answer, and the trend from one blood draw to the next is often more telling.

When to see a doctor

  • Any fever in a baby younger than 3 months.
  • A fever lasting more than three days, or symptoms that improve and then suddenly get worse.
  • Shortness of breath, chest pain, a stiff neck or a rash that does not fade when pressed.
  • Burning when passing urine together with fever or lower back pain.
  • Any infection if you are pregnant, have a weakened immune system, or live with a chronic disease.

Call 999 for severe trouble breathing, bluish lips, fainting or sudden confusion: these can be signs of sepsis.

Glossary

  • Host response: the way your immune system reacts to an infection, which can be measured in the blood.
  • TRAIL: an immune protein that rises mainly during viral infections.
  • IP-10: a signalling protein released during the defence against viruses.
  • CRP: C-reactive protein, made by the liver during inflammation.
  • Procalcitonin: a protein whose blood level rises mostly in bacterial infections.
  • Antibiotic resistance: the ability of bacteria to survive the antibiotics meant to kill them.
  • Equivocal result: a score that points clearly toward neither bacteria nor a virus.

Frequently asked questions

Can a blood test tell if an infection is bacterial or viral?

It can help. CRP, procalcitonin and the full blood count give clues, and combined tests such as MeMed BV improve accuracy. None is perfect: your clinician always reads them together with your symptoms and examination.

Can I ask for the MeMed BV test?

It is mainly available in A&E departments, urgent treatment centres and hospitals whose labs offer it. Whether it is used depends on the facility and on your clinician's judgment.

Does a high CRP always mean a bacterial infection?

No. CRP also rises with some viral infections, after surgery and in inflammatory diseases. A very high level makes a bacterial cause more likely, but context and trends matter.

Does a “viral” result mean I do not need an antibiotic?

It makes a bacterial infection less likely, which often supports skipping one. The decision belongs to your clinician, who may reassess if your condition changes.

Does this test replace a rapid strep test or a urine culture?

No. Those tests identify a specific germ, while MeMed BV measures your body's reaction. The two approaches answer different questions and complement each other.

Sources

Other articles

Understand your own blood test results with AI DiagMe

Have a CRP, procalcitonin or full blood count to make sense of? AI DiagMe helps you understand each value in minutes, in plain language, so you can have a better conversation with your doctor.

Editorial team

  • AI DiagMe

    Author

    The AI DiagMe team brings together physicians, clinical specialists, and medical editors. Our articles are written by health communication professionals and then reviewed and validated by the physicians of our scientific committee, composed of practising hospital physicians in specialties such as haematology, endocrinology, and general medicine. Julien Priour, who leads the editorial mission, holds an MBA from HEC Paris and was trained in scientific writing and publishing by the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD, FUN-MOOC, 2026). Each piece of content is based on current clinical guidelines and peer-reviewed medical publications.

    Email Website
  • Julien Priour

    Edited by

    Co-founder and CEO of AI DiagMe · Senior medical editor · HEC Paris graduate

    Julien Priour is a senior medical editor at AI DiagMe, where he oversees the editorial line and the fact-checking process. A graduate of HEC Paris, he has 3 years of experience in health publishing and was trained in scientific writing and publishing by the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD, FUN-MOOC, 2026). He makes sure that every article follows current medical guidelines and is reviewed and validated by a physician from the scientific and ethics committee. He sets the sourcing standards (HAS, Ameli, INSERM…) and the review standards applied across the entire site.

    Email LinkedIn
  • Dr. Claude Tchonko

    Medically reviewed by

    Dr Claude Tchonko is a haematologist, in practice since 2013, currently working at Clinique Mas de Rochet (Castelnau-le-Lez, France). With an international background, he specialises in the management of haematological malignancies (leukemias, lymphomas, myelomas), with particular expertise in autologous stem cell transplantation, CAR-T cell therapy and the optimisation of care pathways in onco-haematology.

    Author of a reference work, ‘Lymphoid Haematological Malignancies in Mali’, he combines clinical practice with active involvement in projects developing technology solutions for healthcare.

    He holds a State Doctorate in Medicine (Faculty of Medicine of Bamako, 2006) and completed his training with a Certificate of Specialized Studies in Bioclinical Haematology (Abidjan-Cocody, 2010) and several university diplomas: a DFMS in Haematology and an inter-university diploma (DIU) in Onco-Haematological Cytogenetics (Grenoble), as well as a university diploma (DU) in major sickle cell disease (UPEC).

    Dr. Claude Tchonko LinkedIn

Related Posts

Coming soon